HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mifflin, S. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mifflin, S. W.

What Does the Brain Know About Blood Pressure?

Steven W. Mifflin

Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900

	Abstract

 
The integration of baroreceptor inputs within the central nervous system is modulated by a variety of inhibitory processes. It is proposed that, in hypertension, brain stem neurons adapt to increased excitatory baroreceptor inputs by increasing the efficacy of these inhibitory processes. Enhanced inhibition maintains some degree of reflex function in hypertension.

	Introduction

Top Introduction GABAergic feedback inhibition Temporal afferent interactions Baroreceptor afferent... References

 
The arterial baroreceptor reflex is an important determinant of cardiovascular homeostasis. Stretch-sensitive mechano-receptors in the arteries relay information regarding the level and rate of change of blood pressure to the central nervous system, where it is processed to modulate the activity of neurohumoral factors in an attempt to minimize fluctuations in arterial pressure. Baroreceptor afferent inputs are initially integrated by neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), and these neurons then relay the processed input to other central sites involved in neurohumoral regulation of cardiovascular function. At the level of the hindbrain, these other central sites mediate baroreflex regulation of vagal outflow to the heart (via neurons in the nucleus ambiguus) and sympathetic outflow to the heart and blood vessels (via neurons in the caudal and rostral portions of the ventrolateral medulla).

It is clear that the peripheral and central components of the baroreceptor reflex can adapt in response to changes in physiological state. In chronic hypertension, these adaptations typically result in either normal or blunted baroreflex function. A reduced ability of the baroreflex to regulate arterial pressure would result in increased arterial pressure lability and could adversely affect cardiovascular function in hypertensive individuals. Therefore, adaptations that normalize baroreflex function around a higher arterial pressure, as observed in some hypertensive models, are of great potential significance. The past decade has seen a number of studies in both normotensive and hypertensive animals examining baroreceptor afferent integration within the brain stem. A number of integrative processes have been identified within the NTS that might contribute to central baroreflex adaptation in hypertension.

This brief review seeks to illustrate the importance of inhibitory mechanisms within the NTS and to speculate on the possible role of inhibitory mechanisms in mediating baroreflex adaptations in hypertension. The nature of such brief reviews is that the references are by no means a comprehensive listing of the literature in this area. The author apologizes in advance for any oversights, real or perceived.

	GABAergic feedback inhibition

Top Introduction GABAergic feedback inhibition Temporal afferent interactions Baroreceptor afferent... References

 
In the late 1970s, it was recognized that activation of baroreceptor afferents resulted in a sequence of excitation followed by inhibition in many NTS neurons. During extracellular recording of NTS neuronal responses to electrical activation of nerves containing baroreceptor afferent information (e.g., carotid sinus, vagus, aortic, superior laryngeal), this manifests as an initial excitatory response followed by an inhibition of discharge for up to several hundred milliseconds (Fig. 1A). During intracellular recording, electrical activation of cardiovascular afferent nerves evokes what has been assumed to be an analogous biphasic response pattern, and the components are designated as an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) and an inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) (Fig. 1B). The inhibition often observed after stimulation of baroreceptor afferent inputs can be graded as a function of stimulus intensity, generally occurs at the same or a slightly greater stimulus intensity than that necessary to evoke the excitatory component of the response, and temporally overlaps the excitatory component that limits the amplitude and duration of the excitatory response (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. Inhibition of nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) neurons following activation of baroreceptor afferents. A: poststimulus time histogram of extracellularly recorded responses to aortic nerve stimulation (40 stimuli delivered at 0.5 Hz; gray bar marks the aortic nerve stimulus). Note the initial excitatory response at t = 13–15 ms followed by an inhibition of spontaneous discharge for ~35 ms. B: intracellularly recorded responses to carotid sinus nerve (CSN) stimulation, the stimulus being marked by the star. Control indicates excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP-IPSP); reversed IPSP indicates reversal of IPSP polarity following injection of chloride into the cell. Note the temporal overlap between the IPSP and the EPSP so that EPSP amplitude and duration are reduced during the period of inhibition. C: ratemeter record of NTS neuronal excitatory-inhibitory discharge response to increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Note the increase in discharge during the early phases of the pressure increase and the inhibition of discharge at the peak of the pressure ramp. D: response of NTS neuron before (control) and during iontophoretic application of the -aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA) antagonist bicuculline. Top shows ratemeter records of discharge frequency; arterial pressure (AP) is shown at bottom. Figure reproduced from Ref. 12.

The contribution of presynaptic inhibition by GABA_B receptors to afferent-generated inhibition might be much greater than previously realized. Excitatory-inhibitory sequences are commonly observed during extracellular recordings from NTS neurons; 93% of NTS neurons receiving monosynaptic baroreceptor inputs and 95% of those receiving polysynaptic inputs respond to aortic nerve stimulation with excitation followed by inhibition. EPSP-IPSP sequences are not observed as frequently during intracellular recordings from NTS neurons; 33% of NTS neurons receiving monosynaptic baroreceptor inputs and 25% of those receiving polysynaptic inputs respond to aortic nerve stimulation with an EPSP-IPSP sequence. One possible interpretation of the disparity between extracellularly recorded excitation-inhibition and intracellularly recorded EPSP-IPSPs is that the extracellularly observed responses contain a component mediated by disfacilitation, which is the removal of an excitatory input and is typically not associated with a hyperpolarization of membrane potential. This disfacilitation would not be apparent in intracellular records unless the cell was spontaneously discharging action potentials.

Excitatory-inhibitory responses are also observed in the responses of some NTS neurons to natural activation of the arterial baroreceptors by increases in arterial pressure (Fig. 1C). The presence of an obvious excitatory-inhibitory response during an increase in arterial pressure is rare; only 12% of NTS neurons receiving monosynaptic baroreceptor inputs and 14% of neurons receiving polysynaptic inputs respond to an increase in arterial pressure with an obvious excitation-inhibition sequence (20). However, GABAergic inhibition is an important modulator of the NTS neuronal response to an increase in arterial pressure even in the absence of an obvious excitatory-inhibitory response during increases in arterial pressure. Suzuki et al. (12) found that application of the GABA_A receptor antagonist bicuculline or the GABA_B receptor antagonist phaclofen increased the peak discharge frequency response and prolonged the duration of the increase in discharge frequency of NTS neurons during an increase in arterial pressure (Fig. 1D). This further demonstrates that inhibition limits the excitatory response of NTS neurons to an increase in pressure. Many NTS neurons respond to increases in arterial pressure with only a transient increase in discharge frequency (20); therefore, GABA_A and GABA_B receptor-mediated inhibition is likely to be an important modulator of neuronal responses to changes in arterial pressure, even in those cells in which an obvious excitation-inhibition sequence is not observed.

In vivo studies have found that most, if not all, NTS neurons receive tonic GABAergic inputs; therefore, inhibition resulting from activation of baroreceptor afferent inputs might well be important in determining the spontaneous discharge of NTS neurons. Of course, tonic GABAergic inhibition might also arise from other inputs to the NTS, e.g., the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus or the parabrachial nucleus. Tonic GABAergic inhibition might be responsible for the existence of "subthreshold neurons" within the NTS, neurons that do not respond to baroreceptor afferent activation unless their excitability is increased by application of excitatory amino acids (18). The resting membrane potential of subthreshold neurons was more hyperpolarized than the membrane potential of neurons that responded to baroreceptor afferent activation in the absence of exogenous application of excitatory amino acids; therefore, the subthreshold nature of the baroreceptor afferent input could be the result of tonic GABAergic inhibition or the relative absence of depolarizing synaptic and/or hormonal inputs. The observation that some second-order and higher-order NTS neurons receive subthreshold baroreceptor afferent inputs suggests the presence of a "reserve" population of neurons under certain conditions. A change from reserve to active status, either by a reduction in inhibition or an increase in excitatory input, will change the number of neurons involved in baroreflex circuits. This provides a mechanism for regulating reflex function independently of any alteration in the level of peripheral afferent input. The implication of this speculative mechanism is that modulation of baroreflex gain might be accomplished by not only modulating the discharge of NTS neurons but also by altering the number of neurons participating in the reflex.

	Temporal afferent interactions

Top Introduction GABAergic feedback inhibition Temporal afferent interactions Baroreceptor afferent... References

 
Numerous studies have demonstrated time- and frequency-dependent interactions between afferent inputs that could modify the integration of baroreceptor afferent inputs within the NTS. Seller and Illert (10) first described frequency-dependent filtering of afferent inputs within the NTS, and subsequent studies indicate that this filtering is primarily the result of disfacilitation (5, 8). The characteristics of this frequency filtering are such that inputs stimulated at frequencies >10–20 Hz produce markedly reduced postsynaptic responses compared with lower-frequency (0.5–1.0 Hz) inputs (Fig. 2). Since the discharge of myelinated baroreceptor afferents can easily exceed 20 Hz during a single cardiac cycle, this high-frequency filtering has been proposed as a mechanism that limits the excitatory synaptic input to NTS neurons receiving baroreceptor afferent inputs. A recent finding of great interest is that there are differences in the degree of frequency filtering among NTS neurons. Lui et al. (5) reported that frequency-dependent inhibition is less in neurons receiving monosynaptic baroreceptor inputs compared with neurons receiving polysynaptic inputs. We have recently identified a subpopulation of NTS neurons receiving a monosynaptic baroreceptor afferent input that does not exhibit frequency-dependent inhibition during stimulus frequencies up to 50 Hz (K. Zhang and S. Mifflin, unpublished observations) in much the same manner as previously described for NTS neuronal responses to activation of laryngeal afferent inputs (Fig. 2). Therefore, the substrate exists for rapid transmission of the afferent input by some neurons receiving monosynaptic visceral afferent inputs. Such neurons may be involved in the rapid regulation of heart rate and/or sympathetic nerve activity.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. Frequency-dependent inhibitory interactions between laryngeal afferent inputs to NTS neurons. Similar findings exist for baroreceptor afferent inputs to NTS neurons. A: responses of 2 NTS neurons, both receiving monosynaptic afferent inputs, to increasing the stimulation frequency of the afferent nerve as noted in the individual sweeps. The dots mark the stimulus artifacts. B: mean data of relationship between afferent nerve stimulus frequency and amplitude of evoked EPSP as a percentage of the amplitude measured during 1-Hz stimulation for NTS neurons receiving monosynaptic and polysynaptic (c; n = 6) inputs. Monosynaptic population was further subdivided into groups in which the EPSP was significantly depressed as stimulus frequency was increased beyond 2 Hz ( n = 6) and neurons in which the EPSP amplitude did not significantly decline until stimulus frequency was increased beyond 25 Hz (•; n = 5). Asterisks denote significance between the 2 monosynaptic populations. Reprinted from J Auton Nerv Syst 43, Suzuki et al., GABA receptor subtypes involved in the neuronal mechanisms of baroreceptor reflex in the nucleus tractus solitarii of rabbits, 27–36, Copyright 1993, with permission from Elsevier Science.

What is the possible significance of these temporal interactions? It has been suggested that frequency-dependent inhibition within the NTS limits the inhibition of sympathetic outflow obtained during high-frequency aortic nerve stimulation (5). The peak discharge frequency responses to increases in arterial pressure are much lower in NTS neurons receiving polysynaptic afferent inputs compared with neurons receiving monosynaptic inputs (20), and the greater degree of frequency-dependent inhibition in the polysynaptic population might be responsible for this. Seller and Illert (10) suggested that the possible significance of these temporal interactions was to provide a "reserve capacity" to afferent integration. This reserve capacity was proposed to stabilize the discharge of NTS neurons in response to increases or decreases in the level of baroreceptor afferent input. Time- and frequency-dependent inhibitory interactions attenuate the increase in NTS neuronal discharge one might expect during an increase in arterial pressure by reducing the excitatory synaptic input to an NTS neuron. Conversely, the reduction in NTS neuronal discharge during a decrease in arterial pressure might not be as great as anticipated because time- and frequency-dependent interactions are lessened, allowing remaining excitatory inputs to be more fully expressed. Concerning this, we have recently described (20) that fairly dramatic reductions in pressure produce very modest reductions in the spontaneous discharge of NTS neurons. This spontaneous discharge is due to synaptic excitation because it can be abolished by application of non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (18). The reserve capacity provided by temporal interactions might minimize the effects of reducing the intensity of a particular excitatory afferent input.

	Baroreceptor afferent integration in hypertension

Top Introduction GABAergic feedback inhibition Temporal afferent interactions Baroreceptor afferent... References

 
Studies of baroreflex function in hypertension have yielded conflicting results, some studies indicating normal, reduced, or even enhanced reflex gain in chronically hypertensive animals and humans. This variability is probably related to a variety of factors, such as the model of hypertension, the duration and severity of hypertension, and the species studied. The general consensus is that chronic hypertension is associated with either normal or reduced baroreflex function.

As might be expected given the previous discussion of GABA_B receptor-mediated inhibition of NTS neurons, the microinjection of the GABA_B agonist baclofen into the NTS results in baroreflex inhibition and an increase in arterial pressure. In several models of hypertension (SHR, DOCA-salt, and renal wrap hypertensive rats) this GABA_B receptor-induced pressor response is greater than the pressor response evoked by similar injections in normotensive animals, suggesting an upregulation of GABA_B receptor function in the NTS of hypertensive animals (2, 13). In chronic hypertensive animals, NTS neurons receiving monosynaptic baroreceptor afferent inputs exhibit enhanced inhibitory responses to application of baclofen (J. Zhang and S. Mifflin, unpublished observations); recall that in control animals these neurons are fairly insensitive to baclofen inhibition (17). Chronic hypertension is associated with increased expression of GABA_B receptor mRNA within the NTS (2). A recent study suggested that the increased GABA_B inhibition in chronically hypertensive animals is the result of an increase in both the presynaptic and postsynaptic components of the baclofen-induced pressor response (15). Increased baroreceptor afferent input to the NTS in hypertension (see below) is a likely explanation for the increase in the presynaptic component of the baclofen response. It also appears that some factor or factors associated with chronic hypertension, for example increased excitatory or inhibitory synaptic input and/or a circulating hormone, leads to increased expression of the postsynaptic GABA_B receptor and enhanced GABA_B receptor function within the NTS.

The functional significance of the enhanced inhibition that accompanies chronic hypertension may become apparent if we consider the overall level of excitatory baroreceptor afferent input to the central nervous system in hypertension. The landmark studies of Kreiger's group (4) established the concept that baroreceptor afferents undergo a "complete resetting" of their discharge responses to increases in pressure during hypertension, so that the central nervous system receives a "normal" level of excitatory afferent input despite the increased arterial pressure. What has not been appreciated is that, although the responses of individual, presumably myelinated (due to their regular and high-frequency discharge) baroreceptor afferents may be "normal," the absolute number of baroreceptor afferents discharging at a given pressure is increased in chronic hypertension. Jones and Thoren (3) demonstrated this for chronic renal hypertensive rabbits (Fig. 3). In normotensive animals, ~91% of myelinated and ~28% of unmyelinated baroreceptor afferent fibers discharge at the resting levels of arterial pressure. In chronically hypertensive rabbits, ~100% of myelinated and ~78% of unmyelinated baroreceptor afferent fibers discharge at the resting levels of arterial pressure. This indicates a dramatic increase in the amount of tonic excitatory baroreceptor afferent input to the central nervous system in chronic hypertensive animals. This increase in baroreceptor afferent excitatory input in early hypertension is illustrated in the baroreflex curves schematized in Fig. 4A as movement along the line designated (1). The postulated effects of an acute increase in baroreceptor excitatory inputs to an NTS neuron is schematized in Fig. 4B as movement along the line designated (1).

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Baroreceptor discharge in chronically hypertensive rabbits. Percentage of myelinated and unmyelinated afferent fibers active at each stepwise increment in arterial pressure in normotensive (top) and chronic hypertensive (bottom) animals are shown. The arrows on the abscissa mark the resting level of arterial pressure in each group. Reproduced from Ref. 3 with permission.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Proposed mechanism of baroreflex adaptation in chronic hypertension. A: hypothetical baroreflex curves of heart rate and sympathetic nerve discharge as a function of arterial pressure in normotensive and hypertensive animals. The normal resting level of arterial pressure is defined as the operating point (green circle) on the normotensive curve. B: proposed scheme at the level of an NTS neuron. Each diagram corresponds to the circles on the curves illustrated in A. At the normotensive operating point, an NTS neuron receives baroreceptor afferent inputs, some above threshold (solid lines) and some below threshold (dotted lines). The letter B on the soma indicates postsynaptic GABAB receptors. During an acute increase in pressure, there is movement along the normotensive curve, indicated by line 1 in A, to the blue circle on the normotensive curve. At this point, normotensive increased arterial pressure, the NTS neuron in B receives increased baroreceptor afferent inputs, all of which are now above threshold. In chronic hypertension, the midrange of the hypertensive baroreflex curve in A is once again situated at the resting level of arterial pressure (red circle), indicated by line 2. At this new operating point, the baroreflex is again capable of minimizing fluctuations in arterial pressure, albeit around a higher resting level of arterial pressure. A potential mechanism for this shift along line 2 in chronic hypertension is illustrated for an NTS neuron in B and consists of an increase in the expression of postsynaptic GABAB receptors. There is also some reduction in baroreceptor afferent input due to receptor resetting (dotted lines), although the total level of excitatory drive remains increased compared with normotension.

If the system remained at the point indicated by the blue circle in Fig. 4A, the baroreflex would not be capable of responding to increases in arterial pressure very well. Since most reflex studies in hypertensive animals indicate that baroreflex curves are shifted to the right, as schematized in Fig. 4A, most investigators have concluded that adaptations occur within the baroreflex arc in chronic hypertension. It is proposed that enhanced GABA_B-mediated inhibition counteracts or offsets the increased excitatory baroreceptor afferent input to NTS neurons in hypertension, and this is illustrated as movement along line 2 in Fig. 4B. This results in a normalization of NTS neuronal discharge so that the neuron is again capable of responding to increases or decreases in arterial pressure. In support of this, the majority of NTS neurons receiving baroreceptor inputs in hypertensive rats exhibit spontaneous discharge frequencies and responses to baroreceptor afferent stimulation that are no different from the responses observed in normotensive rats (19). Enhanced inhibition in hypertensive animals could also be responsible for the phenomenon of central resetting, in which electrical stimulation of baroreceptor afferent fibers in hypertensive animals results in blunted reflex responses (19). The proposed model can also account for situations in which baroreflex regulation of end-organ responses is reduced, because situations in which the match between the increase in excitatory baroreceptor afferent input and the increase in GABA_B receptor-mediated inhibition is not perfect. It is proposed that these changes at the level of the NTS restore the regulatory capabilities of the baroreflex, illustrated as movement along line 2 in Fig. 4A. This model suggests that baroreflex regulation of the absolute resting level of arterial pressure is sacrificed to maintain the ability of the baroreflex to minimize deviations in blood pressure from the resting level.

To conclude, the processes that mediate baroreceptor afferent integration within the NTS include an impressive array of inhibitory mechanisms. Inhibitory processes will modify the signal that is relayed to subsequent central nuclei in the baroreflex arc. It now appears that an additional layer of complexity must be considered because inhibitory modulatory mechanisms may themselves be modified. The concept that the characteristics of neurons and networks change following chronic alterations in the level of synaptic inputs to maintain an optimal or preferred range of discharge frequency was recently reviewed by Turrigiano (14). Termed "homeostatic plasticity," these changes in neuronal discharge characteristics are proposed to reestablish some degree of regulatory capability to the network. To fully appreciate how homeostatic plasticity within the NTS might impact overall baroreflex function in hypertension, it is useful to examine what is happening in central nuclei subsequent to the NTS integration of the baroreceptor afferent input. One such site, the rostral ventrolateral medulla, contains neurons that are inhibited by activation of baroreceptor afferent fibers and are considered a major determinant of sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone. The spontaneous discharge and baroreceptor inhibition of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla is normal in spontaneously hypertensive rats (11). Therefore, the increased baroreceptor afferent input to the central nervous system in hypertension (Fig. 3) appears to be normalized before the rostral ventrolateral medulla, possibly by the changes observed in the NTS. It will be interesting to determine if adaptive changes accompany other conditions in which the level of peripheral afferent inputs to the central nervous system are chronically altered (e.g., chronic hypoxia, heart failure, bulimia, sleep apnea, or esophageal reflux).

	Acknowledgments

 
I thank Drs. J. R. Haywood and G. M. Toney for their comments on a draft version of this manuscript.

I gratefully acknowledge the support of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-41894 and HL-56637.

	References

Top Introduction GABAergic feedback inhibition Temporal afferent interactions Baroreceptor afferent... References

 

1. Brooks PA, Glaum SR, Miller RJ and Spyer KM. The actions of baclofen on neurones and synaptic transmission in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 457: 115–129, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Durgam VR, Vitela M, and Mifflin SW. Enhanced GABA_B agonist responses and mRNA within the nucleus of the solitary tract of hypertension. Hypertension 33: 530–536, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Jones JV and Thoren PN. Characteristics of aortic baroreceptors with non-medullated afferents arising from the aortic arch of rabbits with chronic renovascular hypertension. Acta Physiol Scand 101: 286–293, 1977.[Web of Science][Medline]
4. Kreiger EM, Salgado HC, and Michelini LC. Resetting of the baroreceptors. In: Cardiovascular Physiology IV. International Review of Physiology, edited by Guyton AC and Hall JE. Baltimore: University Park, 1982, vol. 26, p. 119–145.
5. Lui Z, Chen C-Y, and Bonham AC. Frequency limits on aortic baroreceptor input to nucleus tractus solitarii. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H577–H585, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Mifflin SW. Laryngeal afferent inputs to nucleus tractus solitarius. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 265: R269–R276, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Mifflin SW. Inhibition of chemoreceptor inputs to nucleus tractus solitarius neurons during baroreceptor stimulation. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 265: R14–R20, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Mifflin SW and Felder RB. An intracellular study of time-dependent cardiovascular afferent interactions in nucleus tractus solitarius. J Neurophysiol 59: 1798–1813, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Scheuer DA, Zhang J, Toney GM, and Mifflin SW. Temporal processing of aortic nerve evoked activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract. J Neurophysiol 76: 3750–3757, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Seller H and Illert M. The localization of the first synapse in the carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex pathway and its alteration of the afferent input. Pflügers Arch 306: 1–19, 1968.
11. Sun MK and Guyenet PG. Medullospinal sympathoexcitatory neurons in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 250: R910–R917, 1986.
12. Suzuki M, Kuramochi T, and Suga T. GABA receptor subtypes involved in the neuronal mechanisms of baroreceptor reflex in the nucleus tractus solitarii of rabbits. J Auton Nerv Syst 43: 27–36, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
13. Tsukamoto K and Sved AF. Enhanced GABA-mediated responses in nucleus tractus solitarius of hypertensive rats. Hypertension 22: 819–825, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Turrigiano GG. Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: the more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Neurosci 22: 221–227, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
15. Vitela M and Mifflin SW. GABA_B receptor mediated responses in the nucleus tractus solitarius are altered in acute and chronic hypertension. Hypertension 37: 619–622, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Wang Y and Jordan D. GABA_A and GABA_B receptors are involved in vagal afferent inhibitory input to neurones in the nucleus tractus solitarii. J Physiol (Lond) 504: 197P–198P, 1997.
17. Zhang J and Mifflin SW. Receptor subtype specific effects of GABA agonists on neurons receiving aortic depressor nerve inputs within the nucleus of the solitary tract. J Auton Nerv Syst 73: 170–181, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
18. Zhang J and Mifflin SW. Subthreshold aortic depressor nerve inputs to neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 278: R1595–R1604, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Zhang J and Mifflin SW. Integration of aortic nerve inputs in hypertensive rats. Hypertension 35: 430–436, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Zhang J and Mifflin SW. Responses of aortic depressor nerve evoked neurones in rat nucleus of the solitary tract to changes in blood pressure. J Physiol (Lond) 529: 431–443, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Zhang, F. Yao, S. T. O'Rourke, S. Y. Qian, and C. Sun Angiotensin II enhances GABAB receptor-mediated responses and expression in nucleus tractus solitarii of rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): H1837 - H1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-Y. Chen, A. G. Bechtold, J. Tabor, and A. C. Bonham Exercise Reduces GABA Synaptic Input onto Nucleus Tractus Solitarii Baroreceptor Second-Order Neurons via NK1 Receptor Internalization in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats J. Neurosci., March 4, 2009; 29(9): 2754 - 2761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Herman, M. T. Cruz, N. Sahibzada, J. Verbalis, and R. A. Gillis GABA signaling in the nucleus tractus solitarius sets the level of activity in dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus cholinergic neurons in the vagovagal circuit Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): G101 - G111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Zhang, M. Herrera-Rosales, and S. Mifflin Chronic Hypertension Enhances the Postsynaptic Effect of Baclofen in the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 659 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Simms, J. F. R. Paton, and A. E. Pickering Disinhibition of the cardiac limb of the arterial baroreflex in rat: a role for metabotropic glutamate receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarii J. Physiol., September 15, 2006; 575(3): 727 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Wang, J. Anrather, M. J. Glass, M. J. Tarsitano, P. Zhou, K. A. Frys, V. M. Pickel, and C. Iadecola Nox2, Ca2+, and Protein Kinase C Play a Role in Angiotensin II-Induced Free Radical Production in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 482 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Mueller and E. M. Hasser Putative role of the NTS in alterations in neural control of the circulation following exercise training in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): R383 - R392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vitela, M. Herrera-Rosales, J. R. Haywood, and S. W. Mifflin Baroreflex regulation of renal sympathetic nerve activity and heart rate in renal wrap hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): R856 - R862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-Y. Chen and A. C. Bonham Glutamate suppresses GABA release via presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors at baroreceptor neurones in rats J. Physiol., January 15, 2005; 562(2): 535 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Mei, J. Zhang, and S. Mifflin Hypertension alters GABA receptor-mediated inhibition of neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): R1276 - R1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tolstykh, S. Belugin, O. Tolstykh, and S. Mifflin Responses to GABAA Receptor Activation Are Altered in NTS Neurons Isolated From Renal-Wrap Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 732 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Schreihofer and P. G. Guyenet Baro-Activated Neurons With Pulse-Modulated Activity in the Rat Caudal Ventrolateral Medulla Express GAD67 mRNA J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 1265 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mifflin, S. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mifflin, S. W.