Physiology Cambridge Electronic Design Limited
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


News Physiol Sci 17: 22-26, 2002;
1548-9213/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernheim, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernheim, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, C. R.
News in Physiological Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 1, 22-26, February 2002
© 2002 Int. Union Physiol. Sci./Am. Physiol. Soc.

Human Myoblast Differentiation: Ca2+ Channels are Activated by K+ Channels

Laurent Bernheim1 and Charles R. Bader2

1 Département de Physiologie, Centre Médical Universitaire, and
2 Division de Recherche Clinique Neuro-Musculaire, Département des Neurosciences Cliniques et Dermatologie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland


    Abstract
 
In a paradigm of cellular differentiation, human myoblast fusion, we investigated how a Ca2+ influx, indispensable for fusion, is triggered. We show how newly expressed Kir2.1 K+ channels, via their hyperpolarizing effect on the membrane potential, generate a window Ca2+ current (mediated by a1H T-type Ca2+ channels), which causes intracellular Ca2+ to rise.


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
The generation of multinucleated muscle fibers during postnatal growth and the repair of skeletal muscle depend on the special ability of myoblasts to fuse. Muscle satellite cells, a kind of myogenic stem cell, are responsible for this growth and regeneration potential (13). Satellite cells are small quiescent mononucleated cells lying between the basal lamina and the sarcolemma of the muscle fiber (Fig. 1AGo). When they are activated, satellite cells proliferate as myoblasts. After a few days of proliferation, most myoblasts fuse either with preexisting muscle fibers or with other myoblasts. Fusion between myoblasts leads to multinucleated myotubes that will, with time, mature into new muscle fibers. A small proportion of proliferating myoblasts withdraws from the cell cycle and reconstitutes a new population of quiescent satellite cells (4).



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Myoblast fusion: from an experimental model to a theoretical model. A: a satellite cell (arrow) attached to an acutely dissociated rat muscle fiber (Reprinted from Bader et al., Neuron 1: 237–240, 1988). B: clonal culture of human myogenic cells. The first 3 pictures represent cultures in proliferation medium. From left to right: a single satellite cell (arrow) gives rise to an increasing number of myoblasts. At right a culture kept for 2 wk in differentiation medium is shown. The formation of large striated myotubes was induced by a simple change in culture medium. C: model of the events leading to an increase in [Ca2+]i in fusion-competent myoblasts. Reprinted from Ref. 2, copyright (2000) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.

 
Fusion between myoblasts, or between myoblasts and myotubes, has long been known to be a strictly Ca2+-dependent process that requires an influx of Ca2+ (18). However, investigations in various preparations left several unsolved issues and suggested that different mechanisms may cause this influx of Ca2+ in different species or at different states of development (7,19). We have attempted to characterize the molecular mechanisms involved in this process in clonal cultures of human myoblasts. Our recent results suggest that the membrane resting potential and the biophysical properties of specific ionic channels are important actors in the fusion process in human myogenic cells.


    A model linking ionic channels, membrane potential, and Ca2+ influx during myoblast fusion
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
Human myogenic cells can be studied as freshly isolated satellite cells, can be maintained in culture as undifferentiated proliferating myoblasts, or else can be triggered to differentiate and fuse, by a simple change of the culture medium (Fig. 1BGo). The last property allowed us to investigate events at the onset of fusion using fusion-competent myoblasts, that is, myoblasts cultured at a low density in the fusion-promoting medium. Under these conditions, myoblasts are induced to proceed through the differentiating steps preceding fusion, but because they cannot interact with neighboring cells, they remain mononucleated (11). By investigating membrane currents in these various preparations of myogenic cells, from satellite cells to fusion-competent myoblasts, we observed that there is a sequence in the expression of ionic channels as myoblasts differentiate. Native satellite cells and proliferating myoblasts express exclusively voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+-activated K+ channels (10). Fusion-competent myoblasts, on the other hand, express additional ionic channels in succession: 1) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (11); 2) ether-à-go-go (EAG) and delayed rectifier K+ channels (1,3,15); 3) inward rectifier K+ (Kir) channels (9,12); 4) T-type Ca2+ channels (T channels; Ref. 2); and 5) L-type Ca2+ channels (L channels; Ref. 2). This review will concentrate mainly on Kir and T channels.

Our current understanding of the mechanisms controlling the Ca2+ influx is illustrated in Fig. 1CGo. Human myoblasts must hyperpolarize (i.e., their membrane potential becomes more negative inside the cell) before they can proceed through the fusion process. A similar observation has been made in chick embryonic myoblasts (20). For human cells, this hyperpolarization occurs through the sequential expression of two different K+ currents. An EAG current is expressed first and hyperpolarizes myoblasts to an intermediate resting potential of approximately –32 mV (1,3). Then, slightly before fusion, the expression of a Kir current causes fusion-competent myoblasts to hyperpolarize to approximately –65 mV (12) (it should be recalled that under physiological conditions open K+ channels allow an efflux of K+ when the potential of the cell is more positive than the equilibrium potential for K+ ions (EK); this efflux of K+ leaves negative charges inside the cells). Inhibition of the Kir current depolarizes myogenic cells (12) and impedes fusion (9,12), suggesting that hyperpolarization through functional Kir channels is required for fusion to proceed (9). We propose that the purpose of the hyperpolarization is to set the membrane resting potential of fusion-competent myoblasts in a voltage range at which the necessary inward Ca2+ flux can take place (2). In our model, this Ca2+ influx is generated by a "window current" through T channels that are expressed just before fusion takes place (2).


    Expression of EAG K+ channels hyperpolarizes myoblasts to an intermediate potential
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
A hyperpolarization is observed as soon as human myoblasts differentiate. The resting potential of undifferentiated myoblasts is low (–8 ± 1 mV) (10), and that of newly formed myotubes (–65 ± 1 mV) (12) is similar to the resting potential measured in intact mammalian muscle fibers. We find that fusion-competent myoblasts can be subdivided into two distinct populations with respect to their resting potential. The majority of fusion-competent myoblasts (72% of the total population) has a mean resting potential of –32 ± 1 mV, a potential that lies about halfway between the resting potential of undifferentiated myoblasts and that of newly formed myotubes. The second population (28%) has a mean resting potential of –64 ± 2 mV, a potential that is statistically identical to that of newly formed myotubes (122). The hyperpolarization from –8 mV to –32 mV is linked to the expression of an EAG current (1,3,15). This current activates at voltages more depolarized than –40 mV and, unlike the delayed rectifier K+ current, it does not inactivate at depolarized potentials, which explains why, when expressed, it can hyperpolarize myoblasts to –32 mV. EAG channels cannot, however, account for the hyperpolarization to –65 mV because, at this negative potential, EAG channels are not activated. We found that the second phase of the hyperpolarization (from –32 to –65 mV) is due to the expression of Kir channels.


    Expression of Kir channels precedes fusion and is required for fusion to occur
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
We observed that the fusion-competent myoblasts that are hyperpolarized to –65 mV (28% of the total population) and all newly formed myotubes express a Kir current. An example of Kir current recorded in a hyperpolarized, fusion-competent myoblast is illustrated in Fig. 2AGo. The current-voltage relationship shows a marked change in slope (rectification) at potentials more negative than EK, which means that the inward flux of K+ (from the extracellular medium to the inside of the cells) is more efficient than the outward flux, hence the name "inward rectifier" K+ current. It must be emphasized, however, that it is the small outward K+ current that is responsible for driving the membrane resting potential from –32 mV (EAG channels alone) to –65 mV (at which Kir channels are activated).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Functional inward rectifier K+ (Kir) channels are required during the fusion process. A: a ramp of voltage was applied under voltage clamp conditions to a fusion-competent myoblast superfused by solutions containing 2 different K+ concentrations. As expected for a Kir current, the reversal potential of the current followed EK. The enlargement (top) shows that the Kir current can carry a small outward current. B: Kir current contributes to resting potential of fusion-competent myoblasts because a progressive block of Kir current with increasing concentrations of Cs+ depolarizes cells to about –40 mV (n >= 3). C: myoblast fusion was induced with differentiation medium and challenged with Cs+. {blacksquare}, control; In sister cultures, Cs+ was added to the differentiation medium either during the entire experiment ({blacktriangleup}) or for 3 days (). D: myoblast fusion is reduced by an antisense (AS) probe directed against Kir2.1 but not by an antisense probe against Kir2.2. The fusion index is defined as the number of nuclei in myotubes divided by the total number of nuclei counted in 20 randomly chosen microscope fields. A, B, and C are reprinted from Ref. 12; D is reprinted from Ref. 9 (The Journal of Cell Biology, 2001, vol. 153, p. 677-685 by copyright permission of the Rockefeller University Press).

 
Because Kir channels are sensitive to Cs+ or Ba2+ (12), we could examine the consequences of a block of these channels on the resting potential of fusion-competent myoblasts. Figure 2BGo shows that increasing concentrations of Cs+ cause a progressive depolarization of fusion-competent myoblasts that express Kir channels from –65 mV to approximately –40 mV. EAG channels, which are insensitive to these concentrations of Cs+ and which activate near –40 mV, prevent any further depolarization. A similar result was observed when Ba2+ instead of Cs+ was applied on fusion-competent myoblasts.

If a negative membrane potential or the activity of Kir channels were important for myoblast fusion, a block of Kir channels should affect fusion. We found that this was indeed the case. Figure 2CGo shows that fusion is drastically reduced in cultures treated with Cs+. This cannot be explained by a toxic effect of Cs+ on the cells because, immediately after removal of Cs+, fusion proceeds normally. A similar inhibition of fusion can be obtained by blocking Kir channels with Ba2+ (12). Although these results are consistent with the idea that Kir channel activity is required during the fusion process, it was important to characterize the molecular nature of the Kir channel involved to design more specific molecular tools that would definitely establish the involvement of Kir channels.

The whole cell characteristics of the native Kir current of myoblasts [steep inward rectification and insensitivity to intracellular ATP or nonhydrolyzable GTP analog GTP{gamma}S (12)] suggested that the underlying channel was a member of the Kir2 subfamily (14), of which four members have been isolated thus far. Using RNase protection assays, a method for detecting and distinguishing low levels of highly homologous transcripts, we established that Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 transcripts were present in fusion-competent myoblasts (9).

Concomitantly, we performed single channel recordings on fusion-competent myoblasts to characterize the endogenous Kir channels. We found that fusion-competent myoblasts express a unique type of Kir channel. We then compared the unitary conductance of this endogenous Kir channel to the unitary conductances of cloned Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels. Expression vectors coding for Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels were transfected in proliferating myoblasts (8), and single channel recordings were performed. We observed that the unitary conductance of the Kir2.1 channel (20.0 ± 0.9 pS) was nearly identical to that of the native Kir channel (21.5 ± 0.3 pS), whereas the unitary conductance of the Kir2.2 channel (29.4 ± 0.2 pS) was much larger and had, in addition, never been observed in native fusion-competent myoblasts (9). These results suggest that the Kir channel responsible for the hyperpolarization preceding fusion is formed by Kir2.1 subunits.

Knowing the molecular identity of the Kir channel expressed by fusion-competent myoblasts, it was now possible to use an antisense strategy to demonstrate its involvement in myoblast fusion. The experiments described in Fig. 2DGo show that the formation of multinucleated myotubes is impeded when myoblasts are transfected with a vector expressing Kir2.1 antisense, whereas the inhibition of Kir2.2 channel expression does not affect fusion. These results bring compelling evidence for the implication of functional Kir2.1 channels in human myoblast fusion and demonstrate, without having to rely on pharmacological agents such as Cs+ or Ba2+, that a hyperpolarization of the membrane potential of myoblasts is a prerequisite for fusion (9).


    T-type Ca2+ channels allow an influx of Ca2+ at a hyperpolarized potential
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
In our model, we propose that the purpose of the Kir-associated hyperpolarization is to set the membrane resting potential of fusion-competent myoblasts in a voltage range that triggers a Ca2+ influx through T channels. Although both L channels and T channels are expressed in human myoblasts just before fusion, we could determine that only T channels are required for myoblasts to fuse (2). First, the inhibition of T channels by amiloride or Ni2+ prevents an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) that we normally observe at the onset of fusion (2). Specifically, we find that 25% of fusion-competent myoblasts have a higher [Ca2+]i and that this particular population disappears in the presence of T channel blockers. In contrast, the inhibition of L channels by nifedipine (10 µM) does not affect [Ca2+]i. Second, Fig. 3Go shows that myoblast fusion is drastically inhibited in the presence of T channel blockers (the figure also shows that the inhibition is not due to toxic effects of amiloride or Ni2+ on the cells, since removing the drugs from the culture medium restores normal fusion), whereas the inhibition of L channels by nifedipine (10 µM) does not affect fusion (2).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. T-type Ca2+ channel (T channel) blockers impede myoblast fusion. Ni2+ (A) and amiloride (B) inhibit myoblast fusion, and the effect is reversible. Fusion was induced with differentiation medium and assessed every day for 3 days. {blacksquare}, control. In sister cultures, the 2 compounds were added to the differentiation medium either during the entire experiment ({blacktriangleup}) or for a period of 24-36 h (). Reprinted from Ref. 2, copyright (2000) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.

 
The next step was to understand how a hyperpolarization of the membrane potential mediated by Kir channels could lead to an activation of T channels, since this was somewhat counterintuitive. Indeed, it is well established that T channels activate rapidly from a closed to an open state upon depolarization and that they rapidly switch and stay in an inactivated state as depolarization persists. To move the T channels out of the inactivated state, the cell membrane has to rehyperpolarize, which resets the T channels to the closed state. How then would T channels be activated by a hyperpolarization? A careful analysis of the T channel characteristics of myoblasts showed that a steady-state Ca2+ current through T channels exists in the voltage domain where the activation and inactivation current-voltage relationships overlap (Fig. 4AGo). In this domain, the equilibrium among the closed, open, and inactivated states is such that T channels cycle continuously among the three states and that a tiny fraction of the T channels is always open. This gives rise to a steady-state current that is referred to as a "window current." As we shall see, a steady-state Ca2+ current through T channels, i.e., a T window current, is indeed generated in human myoblasts at potentials between –35 and –75 mV.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Whole cell properties of the T current in fusion-competent myoblasts. A: activation conductance curve () and inactivation conductance curve ({blacksquare}). Left inset: current traces recorded during steady-state inactivation voltage protocol. Right inset: current traces recorded during depolarizing steps (activation protocol). B: computed T window current from curves shown in A. In the window domain, T channels cycle permanently among closed, open, and inactivated states, and thus, statistically, a tiny fraction of the T channels is always open. C: T window current is large enough to induce a sustained change in [Ca2+]i. In 5 cells, changes in indo 1 fluorescence ratios were evaluated at the end of voltage steps lasting >80 s to –75 mV ({blacksquare}, {square}), -55 mV (,{circ}), and –35 mV ({blacktriangleup},{triangleup}). Closed symbols show [Ca2+]i in control conditions, and open symbols show [Ca2+]i when mibefradil (10 µM) was added. The dotted line is the T window current shown in B plotted upside down. Reprinted from Ref. 2, copyright (2000) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.

 
Figure 4 AGoillustrates the biophysical characteristics of a T current recorded in a fusion-competent myoblast. It can be seen that there is an overlap of the activation and inactivation curves centered on –55 mV. Figure 4BGorepresents the T window current computed from the product of the two curves at various membrane resting potentials. From the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation measured in 11 fusion-competent myoblasts, we evaluated that a maximum T window current should be generated at a potential of –58 ± 2 mV and that its amplitude should amount to –0.37 ± 0.01 pA.

To confirm that the computed T window current actually exists at hyperpolarized potentials, we clamped the membrane potential of myoblasts at voltages between –45 and –75 mV for several seconds and looked for a steady-state inward current that would be sensitive to T channel blockers. Because the amplitude of the T window current was expected to be below the resolution of whole cell recordings in fusion-competent myoblasts (<1 pA), these experiments were performed in small myotubes that have higher T current densities (more channels per unit membrane area). We think that this is legitimate since the voltage-dependent characteristics of the T current in fusion-competent myoblasts and myotubes are identical (2). In six small myotubes, we observed that maintaining the voltage steadily at –57 ± 1 mV generated a sustained inward current of –3.00 ± 0.65 pA. In the same myotubes, the T window current computed from the voltage dependence of activation, and inactivation was maximum at –59 ± 3 mV and had a mean amplitude of –2.77 ± 0.5 pA. These results show that fusion-competent myoblasts express T channels and that these channels are able to generate a window current at hyperpolarized potentials.


    T channels expressed in human myogenic cells are mainly formed by {alpha}1H subunits
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
We examined whether the T channels expressed in fusion-competent myoblasts were encoded by one of the three known {alpha}1 subunit genes (17). Antisense oligonucleotides were designed to specifically hybridize to nonconserved 5'-regions of the {alpha}1G, {alpha}1H, or {alpha}1I transcripts. Oligonucleotides were injected with a micropipette into newly formed myotubes that, unlike fusion-competent myoblasts, always express a T current. Again, this choice is justified by the fact that the biophysical properties of the T current in fusion-competent myoblasts are identical to those in myotubes. We found that antisense oligonucleotides directed against the {alpha}1H transcript reduce the T current by 78%. On the other hand, neither {alpha}1G, {alpha}1I, nor scrambled antisense oligonucleotides had any significant effect on the T current (2).


    T window current is large enough to increase [Ca2+]i
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
The T window current observed in fusion-competent myoblasts is <1 pA, but it is sustained as long as the potential remains in the window domain. Because such a small current could theoretically generate a relatively large increase in [Ca2+]i over time, we designed an experiment to demonstrate that the T window current can indeed modify [Ca2+]i in human myogenic cells. For that purpose, the membrane potential of small myotubes was held for >80 s at three different membrane potentials and the steady-state [Ca2+]i was simultaneously evaluated with the Ca2+ indicator indo 1. The membrane potentials had to be maintained constant for >80 s because we had found that this was the time required for [Ca2+]i to reach a steady state after an abrupt change in voltage triggering a large T-type Ca2+ current.

The first holding potential was set below the activation range for T channels (–75 mV), and hence neither a Ca2+ current nor a change in [Ca2+]i should be observed. The second holding potential was set at a voltage value at which T channel activation and inactivation curves overlap (–55 mV), and thus a sustained Ca2+ current should be generated with a sustained change in [Ca2+]i. The third holding potential was set at a voltage at which a large fraction of T channels first activate and then fully inactivate with time (–35 mV). This step potential should only generate a transient Ca2+ current, and thus no sustained [Ca2+]i change should be observed at 80 s.

The results presented in Fig. 4CGo confirm that the small T window current is indeed able to modify [Ca2+]i. At a steady holding potential of –55 mV, a potential at which the T window current is elicited, we observed a sustained increase in [Ca2+]i. This increase was not seen when the myotubes were maintained at potentials 20 mV above or below –55 mV. In addition, the sustained [Ca2+]i increase seen at –55 mV did not occur when a potent T channel blocker, mibefradil, was added to the superfusion solution. From these results we conclude that at defined hyperpolarized potentials T channels can generate a window current that is large enough to modify [Ca2+]i.


    Issues raised by the present model and conclusions
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 
It is immediately apparent that the simple model illustrated in Fig. 1CGo will generate a persistent Ca2+ flux that will load the cell with Ca2+ if no compensatory mechanisms are activated. A possible mechanism that might prevent Ca2+ overload is an upregulation of Ca2+-ATPase pumps at the time of fusion. Indeed, a muscle-specific isoform of Ca2+-ATPase is expressed at the time of myotube formation in mouse C2 myoblasts (6). Another possible way of preventing Ca2+ overload is to act on the inward Ca2+ flux. This could be done by activating other K+ channels such as Ca2+-activated or ATP-dependent K+ channels, because these would drive the membrane potential toward EK, i.e., away from the window domain. This mechanism would reduce the Ca2+ influx and allow Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms to restore basal [Ca2+]i. Incidentally, the interplay between Ca2+ influx and K+ channels may lead to oscillations in membrane potential and/or [Ca2+]i. Either oscillating signal could be used by the cell to orient its differentiation.

Another issue that deserves additional investigation is the role of EAG channels. Indeed, because specific pharmacological blockers of EAG channels are not available yet, the precise role of these K+ channels in fusion-competent myoblasts could not be established. Also, because EAG channels have been implicated in cell-cycle regulation (16), a possible role in the transition between proliferating and fusion-competent myoblasts deserves consideration as well.

Due to our past experience with the study of ionic channels in various differentiating preparations, our approach to myoblast fusion, a subject of intense investigation, has been somewhat unusual. We have explored the possibility that myoblast fusion might be controlled in part by the functional expression of ionic channels. We reviewed here the available evidence in human myogenic cells suggesting that one type of influence exerted by ionic channels on cell differentiation is mediated by their action on membrane potential. Other domains to be explored are the bidirectional interactions between ionic channels and the intracellular signaling network, which comprise kinases, phosphatases, and expression or activation of transcription factors that control specific genes involved in myogenic differentiation (5). Because all cells express ionic channels, it will be interesting to see whether some of the conclusions reached in differentiating human myogenic cells also apply to other cell types.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the Fonds National Suisse pour la Recherche Scientifique (Nos. 31-054177.98 and 4046-058639) and the Fondation Suisse pour la Recherche sur les Maladies Musculaires.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 A model linking ionic...
 Expression of EAG K+...
 Expression of Kir channels...
 T-type Ca2+ channels allow...
 T channels expressed in...
 T window current is...
 Issues raised by the...
 References
 

  1. Bernheim L, Liu JH, Hamann M, Haenggeli CA, Fischer-Lougheed J, and Bader CR. Contribution of a non-inactivating potassium current to the resting potential of fusion-competent human myoblasts. J Physiol (Lond) 493: 129–141, 1996.[Medline]
  2. Bijlenga P, Liu JH, Espinos E, Haenggeli CA, Fischer-Lougheed J, Bader CR, and Bernheim L. T-type alpha 1H Ca2+ channels are involved in Ca2+ signaling during terminal differentiation (fusion) of human myoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 7627–7632, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bijlenga P, Occhiodoro T, Liu JH, Bader CR, Bernheim L, and Fischer-Lougheed J. An ether-a-go-go K+ current, Ih-eag, contributes to the hyperpolarization of human fusion-competent myoblasts. J Physiol (Lond) 512: 317–323, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bischoff R. The satellite cell and muscle regeneration. In: Myology, edited by Engel AG and Franzini-Armstrong C. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, p. 97–118.
  5. Black BL and Olson EN. Transcriptional control of muscle development by myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 14: 167–196, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Brandt P and Vanaman TC. Splicing of the muscle-specific plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase isoforms PMCA1c is associated with cell fusion in C2 myocytes. J Neurochem 62: 799–802, 1994.[Medline]
  7. Constantin B, Cognard C, and Raymond G. Myoblast fusion requires cytosolic calcium elevation but not activation of voltage-dependent calcium channels. Cell Calcium 19: 365–374, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Espinos E, Liu JH, Bader CR, and Bernheim L. Efficient non-viral DNA-mediated gene transfer to human primary myoblasts using electroporation. Neuromuscul Disord 11: 341–349, 2001.[Medline]
  9. Fischer-Lougheed J, Liu JH, Espinos E, Mordasini D, Bader CR, Belin D, and Bernheim L. Human myoblast fusion requires expression of functional inward rectifier Kir2.1 channels. J Cell Biol 153: 677–685, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hamann M, Widmer H, Baroffio A, Aubry JP, Krause RM, Kaelin A, and Bader CR. Sodium and potassium currents in freshly isolated and in proliferating human muscle satellite cells. J Physiol (Lond) 475: 305–317, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Krause RM, Hamann M, Bader CR, Liu JH, Baroffio A, and Bernheim L. Activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors increases the rate of fusion of cultured human myoblasts. J Physiol (Lond) 489: 779–790, 1995.[Medline]
  12. Liu JH, Bijlenga P, Fischer-Lougheed J, Occhiodoro T, Kaelin A, Bader CR, and Bernheim L. Role of an inward rectifier K+ current and of hyperpolarization in human myoblast fusion. J Physiol (Lond) 510: 467–476, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mauro A. Satellite cells of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9: 493–495, 1961.[Free Full Text]
  14. Nichols CG and Lopatin AN. Inward rectifier potassium channels. Annu Rev Physiol 59: 171–191, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Occhiodoro T, Bernheim L, Liu JH, Bijlenga P, Sinnreich M, Bader CR, and Fischer-Lougheed J. Cloning a human ether-a-gogo potassium channel expressed myoblasts at the onset of fusion. FEBS Lett 434: 177–182, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Pardo LA, del Camino D, Sanchez A, Alves F, Bruggemann A, Beckh S, and Stuhmer W. Oncogenic potential of EAG K+ channels. EMBO J 18: 5540–5547, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Perez-Reyes E, Cribbs LL, Daud A, Lacerda AE, Barclay J, Williamson MP, Fox M, Rees M, and Lee JH. Molecular characterization of a neuronal low-voltage-activated T-type calcium channel. Nature 391: 896–900, 1998.[Medline]
  18. Shainberg A, Yagil G, and Yaffe D. Control of myogenesis in vitro by Ca2+ concentration in nutritional medium. Exp Cell Res 58: 163–167, 1969.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Shin KS, Park JY, Ha DB, Chung CH, and Kang MS. Involvement of K(Ca) channels and stretch-activated channels in calcium influx, triggering membrane fusion of chick embryonic myoblasts. Dev Biol 175: 14–23, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  20. Shin KS, Park JY, Kwon H, Chung CH, and Kang MS. A possible role of inwardly rectifying K+ channels in chick myoblast differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 272: C894–C900, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Louis, N. Zanou, M. Van Schoor, and P. Gailly
TRPC1 regulates skeletal myoblast migration and differentiation
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2008; 121(23): 3951 - 3959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. Martinez-Marmol, M. David, R. Sanches, M. Roura-Ferrer, N. Villalonga, E. Sorianello, S. M. Webb, A. Zorzano, A. Guma, C. Valenzuela, et al.
Voltage-dependent Na+ channel phenotype changes in myoblasts. Consequences for cardiac repair
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2007; 76(3): 430 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. Pietrangelo, B. Fioretti, R. Mancinelli, L. Catacuzzeno, F. Franciolini, G. Fano, and S. Fulle
Extracellular guanosine-5'-triphosphate modulates myogenesis via intermediate Ca2+-activated K+ currents in C2C12 mouse cells
J. Physiol., May 1, 2006; 572(3): 721 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
W. J. Moody and M. M. Bosma
Ion Channel Development, Spontaneous Activity, and Activity-Dependent Development in Nerve and Muscle Cells
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2005; 85(3): 883 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
B. Fioretti, T. Pietrangelo, L. Catacuzzeno, and F. Franciolini
Intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel is expressed in C2C12 myoblasts and is downregulated during myogenesis
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): C89 - C96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. Mejia-Luna and G. Avila
Ca2+ channel regulation by transforming growth factor-{beta}1 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in developing mice myotubes
J. Physiol., August 15, 2004; 559(1): 41 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J.-H. Liu, S. Konig, M. Michel, S. Arnaudeau, J. Fischer-Lougheed, C. R. Bader, and L. Bernheim
Acceleration of human myoblast fusion by depolarization: graded Ca2+ signals involved
Development, August 1, 2003; 130(15): 3437 - 3446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
F. Naro, V. De Arcangelis, D. Coletti, M. Molinaro, B. Zani, S. Vassanelli, C. Reggiani, A. Teti, and S. Adamo
Increase in cytosolic Ca2+ induced by elevation of extracellular Ca2+ in skeletal myogenic cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): C969 - C976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernheim, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernheim, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, C. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online