|
|
||||||||
Institut für Biochemie, Genetik und Mikrobiologie, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although endocrine hormones and nervous stimulation rapidly regulate white adipose tissue metabolism according to the current needs of the body, paracrine and autocrine factors determine the cellularity and metabolic responsiveness of the tissue. Both tissue cellularity and metabolic responsiveness are intimately dependent on the cross talk between the cells making up white adipose tissue, i.e., preadipocytes, adipocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells.
| Physiology of white adipose tissue cells |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Preadipocyte proliferation, adipose conversion, and the regulation of adipocyte size are under autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine control. Many of the factors secreted by cells in white adipose tissue not only act locally to influence proliferation, growth, and metabolism but also contribute to whole body homeostasis in an endocrine fashion. A good example for this is leptin, a proteohormone expressed and secreted by adipocytes, which exerts autocrine/paracrine actions on adipocytes (reduction in lipid synthesis) as well as endocrine actions on the central nervous system (most notably reduction in appetite), the pancreatic islets (depletion of the tissue's lipids and therefore inhibition of the insulin production in ß-cells), and other organ systems (18).
Numerous recent reviews focus on white adipose tissue as an endocrine gland and the endocrine regulation of the tissue's functions (see Ref. 18 for an example). Here we want to put emphasis on the autocrine/paracrine interplay of local factors within the adipose organ. One should always keep in mind, however, that all internal cross talk between adipose tissue cells is influenced by and itself influences other tissues on the endocrine level.
| Local communication in adipose tissue |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Kinins are derived from kininogen by the action of kallikrein. It is still unresolved whether kininogen and kallikrein are acquired from the circulation or if they are locally produced. The circulating kallikrein kinin system can be activated on vascular endothelial cells, but studies with rat adipocytes also indicate a local production. Kinins elicit NO and prostacyclin secretion from vascular endothelial cells and are therefore potent vasodilators (14). They also increase the permeability of the endothelium and lead to marked enhancement of the insulin sensitivity of adipocytes (4).
Endothelin is produced in vascular endothelial cells through cleavage of proendothelin to big endothelin and subsequent conversion to endothelin by endothelin-converting enzyme (13). Endothelin is secreted mainly abluminally and acts in a paracrine and autocrine fashion on cells in its immediate vicinity (13): vascular smooth muscle cells respond with long-lasting constriction, whereas vascular endothelial cells react with short-term release of NO and prostacyclin, although vasoconstriction predominates in adipose tissue vasculature. Endothelin is a strong inhibitor of preadipocyte differentiation (10) and induces insulin resistance in adipocytes (17).
NO is liberated in white adipose tissue by preadipocytes, adipocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells (8,14). The enzymes responsible are endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) in vascular endothelial cells and adipocytes and the inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in all cell types when appropriately stimulated. Constitutive expression of iNOS, albeit at low levels, in white adipose tissue can be put down to the fact that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
is expressed and secreted by adipose cells. NO can activate soluble guanylate cyclase and interacts, depending on the redox species, with redox metal-containing proteins and/or with thiol groups of proteins (8). High concentrations of NO inhibit lipolysis stimulated by different pathways, depending on the NO species (NO+, NO, NO-). NO+ increases basal lipolysis, whereas NO and NO- show no effect on basal lipolysis. Low levels of intracellular NO, on the other hand, are necessary for both basal and stimulated lipolysis, because they keep protein kinase A in an active state due to NO's antioxidant-related properties (8). NO is also responsible for blunting the TNF-
-stimulated lipoprotein lipase-activity and uncoupling protein-2 expression. Thus NO appears to function to keep adipocytes in their present status, inhibiting lipolysis and energy dissipation as well as lipogenesis. In addition to its effects on adipocytes, NO is a strong vasodilator in vascular smooth muscle cells (14) and takes part in signaling processes leading to angiogenesis in vascular endothelial cells (15).
Looking at each factor individually does not give a true picture of their physiological significance. The following part of this review will therefore deal with how these local effectors interact on multiple levels to mediate white adipose tissue homeostasis.
Tissue factor interplay to keep adipose tissue cellularity unchanged.
When energy intake equals energy expenditure, white adipose tissue should neither shrink nor grow. This adipose tissue homeostasis is dependent on a balance between locally generated growth stimulators and growth inhibitors whose biological properties neutralize one another to maintain a zero-sum balance on tissue turnover. In contrast to other tissues, in which cell proliferation is the only possible mode of tissue enlargement, local effectors have to be further separated into hyperplastic growth stimulators/inhibitors and hypertrophic growth stimulators/inhibitors.
In principle, three major regulatory mechanisms operate in white adipose tissue: opposing effects are elicited by one and the same factor, simultaneously present inhibitors and stimulators antagonize each others' actions, and amplifying cycles lead to a coordinated rise in factors with similar actions. The following examples illustrate the complexity that governs tissue homeostasis, without any claim to be exhaustive.
If opposing effects are elicited by the same factor, the resulting net effect is determined by the potency of stimulation, time, and the context of other factors present. ANG II, for example, being a potent inhibitor of preadipocyte differentiation and thus hyperplastic growth (16), can provoke adipose conversion indirectly through stimulation of prostacyclin secretion from adipocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. The same is true for ANG II-elicited vasoconstriction, which increases the reesterification of previously liberated free fatty acids, an effect that is counterbalanced by a secondary rise in prostaglandins and NO from adipocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells (14). If prostaglandin production is downregulated, for instance by elevated circulating insulin levels, the antiadipogenic and constrictive actions of ANG II are bound to be stronger. As a second example, prostaglandins show strong antilipolytic effects whenever the Gi pool of the adipocyte is fully available. Shortage of Gi, which could be caused by elevated adenosine levels and a great number of activated adenosine receptors, might lead to Gs coupling of prostaglandin receptors and subsequent enhancement of lipolysis (9). The vasodilator C-type natriuretic peptide, on the other hand, upregulates endothelin receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells, potentiating its vasoconstrictor effect on these cells.
Endothelin and bradykinin are a representative pair of antagonistic factors. Endothelin, commonly recognized as a powerful vasoconstrictor, can only exhibit this effect if kinin levels are not elevated; and although bradykinin acts as a potent insulin sensitizer for adipocytes (4), endothelin causes insulin resistance in the same cells (17).
ANG II and endothelin amplify each others' production and effects. Endothelin stimulates angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, thus leading to a rise in tissue ANG II concentration. ANG II, on the other hand, stimulates endothelin expression, consequently elevating endothelin levels (2).
Enzyme activities that determine the local tissue factor balance.
The tissue level of the individual factors is determined by their rate of production and degradation. Both production and degradation are catalyzed mainly by three proteolytic enzymes, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme, endothelin-converting enzyme, and neutral endopeptidase (Fig. 2
). Angiotensin-converting enzyme cleaves ANG I to produce active ANG II, converts ANG 17 to ANG 15, and cleaves active bradykinin 19, rendering inactive bradykinin 17. Endothelin-converting enzyme mainly activates big endothelin to endothelin but can also inactivate bradykinin. Neutral endopeptidase is involved in the metabolism of many peptides: ANG I is cleaved to active ANG 17, and bradykinin, ANG II, C-type natriuretic peptide, and endothelin are inactivated (13). Both ANG II and endothelin are potent inhibitors of adipose conversion and thus of hyperplastic growth (10,16). They also lead to vasoconstriction, counteracting net lipolysis, because liberated free fatty acids cannot be transported to other tissues and are consequently reesterified. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and endothelin-converting enzyme activities can hence be expected to steer adipose tissue in the direction of hypertrophy, accompanied by elevated basal lipolysis, insulin resistance, and elevated vascular resistance. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme and/or endothelin-converting enzyme activity should therefore lead to smaller fat cells in white adipose tissue with lower basal lipolysis, a greater insulin suppression of lipolysis, and lower peripheral resistance. Figure 3
shows a schematic representation of these adjustments taking place in white adipose tissue during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.
|
|
In humans, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is accompanied by a marked enhancement of insulin suppression of lipolysis (3). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition results in elevated bradykinin levels and lower endothelin concentrations, which shifts the ratio of the insulin sensitizer bradykinin to insulin desensitizer endothelin toward more bradykinin and less endothelin. Basal free fatty acid levels are not directly affected by a change in the ratio of bradykinin to endothelin. A change in adipose tissue cellularity from large to small fat cells is necessary to lower basal lipolysis. During several clinical studies, basal plasma free fatty acids were unchanged or suppressed by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, depending on the time scale of the experiment. No effects were observed during acute angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor administration, whereas treatment over a period of several months led to suppression of plasma free fatty acids (3). This argues for the above-mentioned change in adipose tissue cellularity, because basal lipolysis is enhanced in hypertrophic adipocytes and development of a greater number of small adipocytes is associated with lowered plasma free fatty acid concentrations through an enhanced uptake into these cells. Changes in angiotensin-converting enzyme activity are not associated with changes in body composition in humans (3), indicating that the increased hyperplastic adipose tissue growth may have compensated for the decrease in fat cell hypertrophy in humans as in rats. Combined endothelin-converting enzyme and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition would be expected to intensify these changes (13).
The effect of changes in neutral endopeptidase activity cannot be as easily predicted, because both hypertrophic and hyperplastic factors are degraded (13). Although neutral endopeptidase inactivates the vasoconstrictors ANG II and endothelin, it also inactivates the vasodilators ANG 17 and bradykinin. On the adipocyte level, neutral endopeptidase could be expected to lead to a diminished prostacyclin production, because both inductors ANG II and bradykinin are degraded. The production of ANG 17 depends not only on neutral endopeptidase activity but also on angiotensin-converting enzyme, because a high rate of ANG II production depletes the ANG I pool available for conversion to ANG 17 (14). Neutral endopeptidase inhibitors have not yet been tested with respect to their effects on adipose tissue, and prediction of the outcome is difficult.
White adipose tissue homeostasis can only be achieved during times of steady-state energy flux. Modern civilizations, however, favor a net energy balance that is positive, which leads to overall growth in fat stores. Although a great number of clinical trials have shown the association of obesity with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension, few studies investigated the impact of adipose tissue cellularity on clustering of these disorders in one person. If and how this increase in white adipose tissue mass becomes harmful to the individual shall be explored in the next section.
| When adipose tissue growth becomes a problem |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whereas thiazolidindiones are artificial substances, factors occurring naturally in the body are also able to alter the way of adipose tissue growth, as seen above. Understanding the interplay of local effectors that determine the size and number of adipocytes in a given fat depot can thus lead to a more profound understanding of adipose tissue's role in the insulin resistance syndrome. Individuals with a high ratio of the hypertrophic factors ANG II and endothelin to the hyperplastic factors kinins, prostaglandins, NO, and ANG 17 can be expected to exhibit a greater ratio of hypertrophic to hyperplastic adipose tissue growth during positive energy balance and therefore to be at a greater risk of metabolic and hemodynamic disorders. Next we discuss this issue in greater detail with respect to each individual disorder.
Dyslipidemia.
Imbeault et al. (12) showed that subcutaneous abdominal fat cell weight was the best independent variable predicting plasma triacylglycerols and low-density lipoprotein-apolipoprotein B levels in humans. They concluded that, for a given visceral white adipose tissue deposition, the presence of hypertrophic subcutaneous abdominal adipocytes appears to be associated with further deterioration of the metabolic risk profile.
Insulin resistance.
Hennes et al. (11) discovered that resistance to the antilipolytic actions of insulin, a characteristic of hypertrophic adipocytes, distinguishes abdominally obese hypertensives from normotensive obese and normal weight subjects, a relationship that is independent of visceral adipose tissue mass. They attribute the insulin resistance to a more active angiotensin-converting enzyme because angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition not only lowered blood pressure but also significantly improved insulin-resistant lipolysis.
Hypertension.
The relationship between adipose tissue expansion and blood pressure is most complex. Weight gain per se always leads to increased cardiac output and blood volume. This increase is compensated for by a reduction in peripheral resistance through neovascularization of the new tissue mass. Thus weight gain only leads to a rise in blood pressure if the simultaneous increase in cardiac output is not fully compensated for. Adipose tissue is generally a low-resistance tissue compared with resting muscle. If weight gain were achieved by hyperplastic white adipose tissue growth, then the concomitant development of blood vessels would result in an expanded vascular tree capable of dispersing the elevated blood volume. If, however, adipose tissue mass were elevated mainly through increased adipocyte cell size, new vessels would not form and the resulting obesity hypertension would be characterized by elevated cardiac output and inappropriately normal peripheral resistance. This is indeed the distinguishing feature of obesity-induced hypertension compared with hypertension in a lean person. Insulin-resistant lipolysis in white adipose tissue might therefore be circumstantial evidence for hypertrophic adipose tissue growth in those obese individuals that have developed hypertension due to the inability to lower peripheral resistance in the face of weight gain-induced elevated cardiac output.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Barandier, J.-P. Montani, and Z. Yang Mature adipocytes and perivascular adipose tissue stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: effects of aging and obesity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H1807 - H1813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schling and T. Schafer Human Adipose Tissue Cells Keep Tight Control on the Angiotensin II Levels in Their Vicinity J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48066 - 48075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |