Physiology AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology 20: 218-224, 2005; doi:10.1152/physiol.00015.2005
1548-9213/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shoham, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shoham, T.
Physiology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 218-224, August 2005
© 2005 Int. Union Physiol. Sci./Am. Physiol. Soc.

EMERGING TOPICS

Protein-Protein Interactions in the Tetraspanin Web

Shoshana Levy and Tsipi Shoham

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California

levy{at}cmgm.stanford.edu


    Abstract
 
Tetraspanins are evolutionarily conserved membrane proteins that tend to associate laterally with one another and to cluster dynamically with numerous partner proteins in membrane microdomains. Consequently, members of this family are involved in the coordination of intracellular and intercellular processes, including signal transduction; cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration; cell fusion; and host-parasite interactions.


    Tetraspanin structure
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
As can be inferred from their name, tetraspanins contain four transmembrane (TM) domains. They differ from other proteins with four TM domains by a shared overall structure of the extracellular and intracellular domains and by the presence of conserved amino acid residues (19, 36) (FIGURE 1Go).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Structural features of tetraspanins
Tetraspanins are composed of 4 transmembrane domains (TM; green cylinders) containing conserved residues. TM1 and TM2 flank the SEL, and TM3 and TM4 flank the LEL. Tetraspanins contain several conserved amino acid residues, as detailed in previous reviews (19, 36). Shown here is the conserved CCG motif in the LEL, which forms disulfide bridges (black lines) with additional conserved cysteines (peach circles). The example shown is that of CD81 LEL, whose 3-dimensional structure has been solved (25, 26) and which contains 2 disulfide bridges. The number of disulfide bridges varies from 2 to 4 among family members (45). The CD81 LEL does not contain potential glycosylation sites, unlike most tetraspanins. Highlighted here are conserved cysteines, which are potential palmitoylation sites in the amino and carboxy terminals and the inner loop of the intracellular portion of the molecules.

 
A review focusing on functional domains within this structure has recently been published (50); therefore, the salient features important for protein-protein interactions are briefly summarized here. The tetraspanin TM domains flank a small and a large extracellular loop (SEL and LEL, respectively). The extracellular loops vary among family members. On the other hand, the LEL contains characteristic motifs, especially the conserved cysteine-cysteine-glycine (CCG) motif, which is the focal point for the formation of two to four disulfide bridges with additional cysteine residues at fixed positions within the LEL (45). The three-dimensional structure of the homodimer of one tetraspanin LEL, CD81, has been solved (25, 26) (FIGURE 1Go). Most tetraspanins’ LELs are glycosylated in one or more potential N-glycosylation sites. Such sites are rarely present in the SEL, and, when they are present, it is unknown whether they are indeed glycosylated. The presence of highly conserved cytoplasmic cysteine res-idues is an additional hallmark of this family. These cysteines have been shown to be palmitoylated and to play a central role in interactions within the tetraspanin web, as detailed below.


    Tetraspanins are evolutionarily highly conserved and expressed ubiquitously
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
The first members of this family were identified in human (22) and in Schistosomes (60). Confirmation of the conservation of this family in evolution comes from recent studies that have identified members of this family in early metazoa (1), in fungi (18), and in nematodes (41). Moreover, multiple tetraspanins are expressed in each organism; for example, there are at least 37 family members expressed in Drosophila (55). In humans, tetraspanins are expressed in all cell types, each of which usually expresses multiple family members.


    Tetraspanins are distinguished from other membrane proteins: clustering in the tetraspanin web
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
The most distinctive feature of the tetraspanin family is the ability of its members to form lateral associations with multiple partner proteins and with each other in a dynamic assembly, described as the tetraspanin web (44) (FIGURE 2Go). The tetraspanin web plays an important role in cell-cell interactions and in cell-fusion events. Thus CD81 was shown to localize in immune synapses of both B and T cells (38). Both CD9 and CD81 were shown to be involved in egg-sperm fusion (21, 23), and mice that are deficient for CD9 and for CD81 spontaneously develop multinucleated giant cells in the lung (52). The expression of CD81 is required for the infection of hepatocytes by Plasmodium yoelii in mice, and an anti-CD81 MAb inhibits the infection of human hepatocytes by Plasmodium falciparum (48). The tetraspanin PSL1, expressed by the fungus Magnaporthe grisea, is necessary for its binding and penetration of rice leaves (12).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Membrane clustering of tetraspanin-enriched microdomains
A: aerial view of tetraspanin-partner and tetraspanin-tetraspanin interactions. B: side view of lateral associations of tetraspanins with partner molecules. Clustering is facilitated by palmitoylation of conserved cysteines in the intracellular domains of the interacting proteins (right). Tetraspanins are shown in shades of green; partners of the immunoglobulin superfamily are shown in red and brown, and those of the integrin are in blue.

 
The associations within the web of tetraspanins with their nontetraspanin partner molecules have been referred to as primary (4). A distinct aspect of primary interactions is that a single tetraspanin molecule can form different partnerships in different cell types. Thus the same tetraspanin molecule that forms a partnership with protein X in one cell type can form a partnership with protein Y in a second cell type. For example, CD81 associates in B cells with a B-lineage-specific molecule, CD19 (6), whereas in T cells it associates with CD4 and CD8 (54). The most common partners of tetraspanins are specific members of the integrin (2) and the immunoglobulin superfamilies (6, 49). Finally, partnerships can be formed with the extracellular or the intracellular domains of the interacting molecules. Thus CD81 associates with the extracellular domain of CD19 (5, 37) and with the intracellular domain of another partner, EWI-2 (28, 49). Both CD19 and EWI-2 are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily (FIGURE 3Go).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Interactions of tetraspanins with partner proteins can be formed via different structural domains
The site of interaction between CD151 and the {alpha}3-integrin has been mapped to the QRD sequence in the CD1515 LEL, which is the binding site of the TS151r MAb. The interaction between CD81 and EWI-2 depends on the cytoplasmic portion of EWI-2, whereas the interaction of CD81 with CD19 requires the extracellular domain of CD19. Brackets indicate mapped interacting domains. See text for references.

 
Some associations with partners are highly stoichiometric, are highly avid and retained after lysis in harsh detergents (such as 1% NP-40), and are direct, as demonstrated by chemical crosslinking (61, 66). Examples of such avid partnerships are the association of CD151 with {alpha}3ß1-integrin and the pairing of uroplakins (57, 65). Reported additional associations between tetraspanins and partner proteins have been documented by nonquantitative coimmunoprecipitation in milder detergent conditions, such as 1% Brij 96 or 1% Brij 97, or by fluorescent energy-transfer studies (51). However, several detailed studies have demonstrated that specific MAbs, e.g., the anti-CD151 MAbs, TS151r (46), and 8C3 (42), can disrupt these associations (24, 42, 46). Therefore, coimmunoprecipitation studies with antibodies that disrupt associations may underestimate the stoichiometry of interactions. Nevertheless, such MAbs are ex-tremely valuable for functional studies. For example, mutating the TS151r binding site in CD151 led to functional changes in integrin-dependent spreading (24), and the removal of CD151 from {alpha}3ß1-integrin by the MAb 8C3 led to reduced binding of the stripped integrin to laminin (42).

Tetraspanin-tetraspanin associations, formed between members of the family, have been referred to as secondary (4). These secondary associations are not disrupted by mild detergents (1% Brij 96 or 1% Brij 97) and can be augmented by the presence of divalent cations (7). Tetraspanin-tetraspanin interactions are not stoichiometric, and it is still unknown whether all tetraspanins expressed in a certain cell are associated with each other. Recent studies have demonstrated that palmitoylation is necessary for the maintenance of tetraspanin-tetraspanin interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis of all of the juxtamembrane cysteines of CD9 and of CD151 resulted in the disruption of these secondary interactions (7, 63).

Importantly, tetraspanins associate indirectly with additional proteins, which have been referred to as class 3 interactions. These tertiary interactions are not disrupted in milder detergents, such as 1% CHAPS. Functionally, these interactions cluster in tetraspanin-enriched microdomains, enabling lateral dynamic organization in the membrane and the cross-talk with intracellular signaling and cytoskeletal structures.


    Tetraspanin web proteins cluster in the membrane in tetraspanin-enriched microdomains
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
The fact that several tetraspanin molecules form primary, secondary, and tertiary biochemical interactions and that the engagement of individual tetraspanins could lead to identical functional responses in single cell types led to the concept of the tetraspanin web (4). Additional studies documented the clustering of tetraspanins and partner proteins with cholesterol (8) in tetraspanin-enriched microdomain membrane (TEM) (3).

Functional lateral associations of tetraspanins and partner proteins in TEM have been documented in the immune system. For example, antigen-presenting cells (APC) secrete exosomes (17), which are enriched in tetraspanins and were shown to be extremely effective in antigen presentation (70). These exosomes are the secreted fusion products of the plasma membrane with major histocompatability complex (MHC) class II compartments (MIIC). MIIC consist of multivesicular bodies that are enriched in MHC class II and in the MHC class II-like molecules, which function in the intracellular processing and loading of peptide antigens. In addition, MIIC are enriched in the tetraspanins CD37, CD53, CD63, CD81, and CD82. Tetraspanins were also shown to cluster on the cell surface of APC with a selected subset of MHC class II molecules. In humans, such clusters are identifiable by a specific MAb that interacts only with clustered MHC class II epitopes (CDw78). These clusters were shown to preferentially function in the actual presentation of selected peptide antigens (30).

Tetraspanins also cluster in specialized structural units. For example, there are specialized family members that are present in the apical surface of mammalian bladder epithelium (urothelium) in crystalline structures called urothelial plaques. These plaques are highly enriched in four proteins, two of which, uroplakins Ia and Ib (UPIa and UPIb), are tetraspanins that associate with their nontetraspanin partners uroplakin II (UPII) and uroplakin III (UPIII) (67). Biochemical studies have shown that the four uroplakins interact in pairs of one tetraspanin and one nontetraspanin: UPIa/II and UPIb/III (33). Uroplakins serve as an excellent model to illustrate how primary interactions are formed because of the reduced complexity of their interactions in the urothelium, as detailed below.

Certain tetraspanins are enriched in specific subcellular organelles. The best example of this is CD63, which contains the lysosomal targeting motif GYEVM. Interestingly, the Drosophila sunglasses (sun) tetraspanin, which is most closely related to CD63 and is accumulated in lysosomes, does not contain this motif (62).


    Tetraspanin-partner associations during biosynthesis: lessons from knockout mice
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
The fundamental question of whether tetraspanin-partner associations occur during biosynthesis has recently begun to be addressed. The most stringent dependency on tetraspanin-partner coexpression during biosynthesis has been shown for uroplakins. UPIa and UPIb form partnerships with UPII and UPIII, respectively, that are highly stoichiometric. Transfection of uroplakin molecules into nonurothelial cells demonstrated that these specific pairings are initiated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and are required for exit of the interacting molecules from this compartment (57). This conclusion was strengthened by the subsequent generation of UPII- and UPIII-deficient mice, which have impaired urothelial plaques because of lack of heterodimer formation (15, 29). These studies in knockout mice establish the role of the nontetraspanin uroplakins (UPII and UPIII) in the exit of their associated tetraspanin uroplakins (UPIa and UPIb) from the ER/pre-Golgi to the cell surface.

It was therefore expected that CD151, which is strongly associated with the {alpha}3-integrin (46, 65) would be required for the cell-surface expression of this integrin. This expectation was strengthened by a study in a human cell line that indicated that CD151 and {alpha}3-integrin associate during biosynthesis (24). However, CD151-deficient mice express normal levels of {alpha}3-integrin and of other integrins (59). This study demonstrates that neither a very strong association on the cell surface nor even an association during biosynthesis necessarily implies a regulatory role in the trafficking and cell-surface expression of a partner.

Unlike CD151, CD81 is necessary for cell-surface expression of its B cell partner, CD19 (47). The partnership of CD81 with CD19 was first demonstrated in human B cells (6). Subsequently, three independent lines of CD81-deficient mice showed reduced CD19 cell-surface expression (35, 40, 56). However, some CD19 molecules are expressed on the cell surface in the absence of CD81, possibly implicating additional proteins in the regulation of CD19 expression. The possibility of redundancy of tetraspanins to support CD19 expression was investigated by analyzing mice deficient in CD9 (47), CD37 (27), Tssc6 (53), and Tspan3 (unpublished observations). All of these express normal levels of CD19. It is also important to note that the CD81/CD19 partnership differs from that of the paired uroplakins in that the relationships are not reciprocal; CD19-deficient mice have normal expression of CD81 (47).

Therefore, web assembly may occur in multiple steps in conjunction with trafficking within the different cellular compartments in which web subunits are formed (FIGURE 4Go). Tetraspanin-partner interactions may be initiated early, in the ER, as seen for the pairing of uroplakins or of CD151 with the {alpha}3-integrin. However, these early interactions are not necessarily required for cell-surface expression of the associated tetraspanins and their partner proteins, as seen for CD151 and the {alpha}3-integrin. Tetraspanin-tetraspanin associations are more likely to occur in the Golgi compartment because they depend on palmitoylation, as detailed below.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Assembly of the tetraspanin web
Early in biosynthesis, tetraspanins can form specific interactions with their associated partner proteins in the ER, as demonstrated for the pairing of uroplakins and for the association of CD151 with the {alpha}3-integrin. Tetraspanin-tetraspanin interactions are likely to form in the Golgi upon palmitoylation, leading to the assembly of larger multicomponent complexes. Palmitoylation of specific partners, such as laminin-binding integrins, may also contribute to the clustering in the tetraspanin web. Tetraspanins (shades of green) partner immunoglobulin (red) or integrin (blue) family members. Tetraspanin-partner interactions (blue ties), tetraspanin-tetraspanin interactions (purple ties), and palmitoylation (black triangled arrows) are also shown.

 

    Maintenance and dynamics of interactions in the tetraspanin web
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
Palmitoylation of the intracellular cysteine residues has been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of tetraspanin-tetraspanin interactions. The replacement of these cysteines by other amino acids, which abolished the palmitoylation of CD9 (7) and of CD151 (3, 63), reduced their association with other tetra-spanins.

Significantly, the palmitoylation of partner proteins also contributes to their incorporation into TEM, as demonstrated in a recent study of the specific associations of CD151 with the laminin-binding integrins {alpha}3ß1, {alpha}6ß1, and {alpha}6ß4 (64). This study demonstrated that not only CD151 but also its coprecipitated, laminin-binding {alpha}3-, {alpha}6-, and ß4-integrins, but not {alpha}2-integrin, were palmitoylated. Moreover, the replacement of all seven cysteines by serine residues in the ß4-integrin abolished the palmitoylation of this integrin. This, in turn, impaired its inclusion in TEM with other laminin-binding integrins, with CD151, and with the additional tetraspanins CD9, CD63, and CD81. Functionally, this depalmitoylation had an effect on cell spreading.

The palmitoylation of CD81 was also shown to affect its association with a member of the serine/threonine-binding signaling protein family called 14-3-3s. Interestingly, this association occurred only under oxidative stress, which inhibited the palmitoylation of CD81. This was confirmed by substituting all five cysteines in CD81 with alanines, which induced the association of CD81 with the 14-3-3 protein (11).

Most importantly, palmitoylation has been shown to play a key role in the dynamic reorganization of TEM in B cells responding to stimulation. An earlier study demonstrated that coengagement of two complexes on the surface of B cells, the B cell receptor (BCR) complex and the CD19/C21/CD81 complex, reduced the threshold of B cell activation (14). Subsequently, it was demonstrated that the coengagement of the two molecular complexes on the surface of B cells induced membrane reorganization in a CD81-dependent manner, enabling enhanced signaling (10). The most recent study (9) demonstrated that the coengagement of both complexes was accompanied by an increase in the incorporation of labeled palmitic acid into CD81. Moreover, the newly palmitoylated molecules were associated with detergent-resistant microdomains (DRM) and were chased from the low-density sucrose fractions containing the DRM, suggesting that this modification is dynamic.


    Tetraspanins as cell-surface receptors
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
An endogenous soluble ligand, PSG17, has been identified for mouse CD9 (58). The tetraspanin CD9 is required for egg-sperm fusion, and females of CD9-deficient mice have severe fertility impairment (23, 31, 39). Interestingly, the PSG17 ligand was shown to partially block sperm-egg fusion (16); however, the biological relevance of this finding is unclear, because the pregnancy-specific protein is not likely to regulate gamete fusion. An additional tetraspanin, CD81, has been identified as the receptor for the hepatitis C virus envelope protein E2 (43). The binding site for E2 on CD81 has been mapped to an epitope located within the inner helices, which are in close proximity to the disulfide bridges within the LEL (FIGURE 1Go) (20). Interestingly, the homologous region in CD9 is important for egg-sperm fusion (69) and the same region in CD151 is required for its lateral interaction with the {alpha}3-integrin (24). Currently, CD9 and CD81 are the only known tetraspanins that were identified as cell-surface receptors for soluble ligands.


    Tetraspanin signaling ports
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 
Additional studies have implicated tetraspanins in the coordination of intracellular signaling pathways with the cytoskeleton, as detailed in a recent review (32). Briefly, Rho-GTPase was shown to link the cytoskeleton with CD82 (13); G protein-coupled receptors were demonstrated to be dynamically regulated by CD9 and CD81 in human cells (34) and by sun in Drosophila melanogaster (62); and phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase and protein kinase C, the signaling components that interact with integrins, were also shown to associate with several tetraspanins (68). In light of these facts, we suggest that TEM are microenvironments analogous to transportation ports. However, unlike seaports and airports, which function as hubs of activity but occupy fixed positions, tetraspanin-signaling ports are dynamic and quick to respond and to coordinate intracellular and intercellular activities.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Joseph Haimovich and Ronald Levy for their comments on this review.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants CA-34233 and AI-45900).


    References
 Top
 Tetraspanin structure
 Tetraspanins are evolutionarily...
 Tetraspanins are distinguished...
 Tetraspanin web proteins cluster...
 Tetraspanin-partner associations...
 Maintenance and dynamics of...
 Tetraspanins as cell-surface...
 Tetraspanin signaling ports
 References
 

  1. Adell T, Gamulin V, Perovic-Ottstadt S, Wiens M, Korzhev M, Muller IM, and Muller WE. Evolution of metazoan cell junction proteins: the scaffold protein MAGI and the transmembrane receptor tetraspanin in the demosponge Suberites domuncula. J Mol Evol 59: 41–50, 2004.[Medline]
  2. Berditchevski F. Complexes of tetraspanins with integrins: more than meets the eye. J Cell Sci 114: 4143–4151, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Berditchevski F, Odintsova E, Sawada S, and Gilbert E. Expression of the palmitoylation-deficient CD151 weakens the association of {alpha}3ß1 integrin with the tetraspanin-enriched micro-domains and affects integrin-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem 277: 36991–37000, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Boucheix C and Rubinstein E. Tetraspanins. Cell Mol Life Sci 58: 1189–1205, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Bradbury LE, Goldmacher VS, and Tedder TF. The CD19 signal transduction complex of B lymphocytes. Deletion of the CD19 cytoplasmic domain alters signal transduction but not complex formation with TAPA-1 and Leu 13. J Immunol 151: 2915–2927, 1993.[Abstract]
  6. Bradbury LE, Kansas GS, Levy S, Evans RL, and Tedder TF. The CD19/CD21 signal transducing complex of human B lymphocytes includes the target of antiproliferative antibody-1 and Leu-13 molecules. J Immunol 149: 2841–2850, 1992.[Abstract]
  7. Charrin S, Manie S, Oualid M, Billard M, Boucheix C, and Rubinstein E. Differential stability of tetraspanin/tetraspanin interactions: role of palmitoylation. FEBS Lett 516: 139–144, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Charrin S, Manie S, Thiele C, Billard M, Gerlier D, Boucheix C, and Rubinstein E. A physical and functional link between cholesterol and tetraspanins. Eur J Immunol 33: 2479–2489, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Cherukuri A, Carter RH, Brooks S, Bornmann W, Finn R, Dowd CS, and Pierce SK. B cell signaling is regulated by induced palmitoylation of CD81. J Biol Chem 279: 31973–31982, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cherukuri A, Shoham T, Sohn HW, Levy S, Brooks S, Carter R, and Pierce SK. The tetraspanin CD81 is necessary for partitioning of coligated CD19/CD21-B cell antigen receptor complexes into signaling-active lipid rafts. J Immunol 172: 370–380, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Clark KL, Oelke A, Johnson ME, Eilert KD, Simpson PC, and Todd SC. CD81 associates with 14-3-3 in a redox-regulated palmitoylation-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 279: 19401–19406, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Clergeot PH, Gourgues M, Cots J, Laurans F, Latorse MP, Pepin R, Tharreau D, Notteghem JL, and Lebrun MH. PLS1, a gene encoding a tetraspanin-like protein, is required for penetration of rice leaf by the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 6963–6968, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Delaguillaumie A, Lagaudriere-Gesbert C, Popoff MR, and Conjeaud H. Rho GTPases link cytoskeletal rearrangements and activation processes induced via the tetraspanin CD82 in T lymphocytes. J Cell Sci 115: 433–443, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dempsey PW, Allison ME, Akkaraju S, Goodnow CC, and Fearon DT. C3d of complement as a molecular adjuvant: bridging innate and acquired immunity. Science 271: 348–350, 1996.[Abstract]
  15. Deng FM, Liang FX, Tu L, Resing KA, Hu P, Supino M, Hu CC, Zhou G, Ding M, Kreibich G, and Sun TT. Uroplakin IIIb, a urothelial differentiation marker, dimerizes with uroplakin Ib as an early step of urothelial plaque assembly. J Cell Biol 159: 685–694, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ellerman DA, Ha C, Primakoff P, Myles DG, and Dveksler GS. Direct binding of the ligand PSG17 to CD9 requires a CD9 site essential for sperm-egg fusion. Mol Biol Cell 14: 5098–5103, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Escola JM, Kleijmeer MJ, Stoorvogel W, Griffith JM, Yoshie O, and Geuze HJ. Selective enrichment of tetraspan proteins on the internal vesicles of multivesicular endosomes and on exosomes secreted by human B-lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 273: 20121–20127, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gourgues M, Clergeot PH, Veneault C, Cots J, Sibuet S, Brunet-Simon A, Levis C, Langin T, and Lebrun MH. A new class of tetraspanins in fungi. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297: 1197–1204, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Hemler ME. Specific tetraspanin functions. J Cell Biol 155: 1103–1107, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Higginbottom A, Quinn ER, Kuo CC, Flint M, Wilson LH, Bianchi E, Nicosia A, Monk PN, McKeating JA, and Levy S. Identification of amino acid residues in CD81 critical for interaction with hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E2. J Virol 74: 3642–3649, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Higginbottom A, Takahashi Y, Bolling L, Coonrod SA, White JM, Partridge LJ, and Monk PN. Structural requirements for the inhibitory action of the CD9 large extracellular domain in sperm/oocyte binding and fusion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311: 208–214, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Hotta H, Ross AH, Huebner K, Isobe M, Wendeborn S, Chao MV, Ricciardi RP, Tsujimoto Y, Croce CM, and Koprowski H. Molecular cloning and characterization of an antigen associated with early stages of melanoma tumor progression. Cancer Res 48: 2955–2962, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kaji K, Oda S, Miyazaki S, and Kudo A. Infertility of CD9-deficient mouse eggs is reversed by mouse CD9, human CD9, or mouse CD81; polyadenylated mRNA injection developed for molecular analysis of sperm-egg fusion. Dev Biol 247: 327–334, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Kazarov AR, Yang X, Stipp CS, Sehgal B, and Hemler ME. An extracellular site on tetraspanin CD151 determines {alpha}3 and {alpha}6 integrin-dependent cellular morphology. J Cell Biol 158: 1299–1309, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kitadokoro K, Bordo D, Galli G, Petracca R, Falugi F, Abrignani S, Grandi G, and Bolognesi M. CD81 extracellular domain 3D structure: insight into the tetraspanin superfamily structural motifs. EMBO J 20: 12–18, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Kitadokoro K, Ponassi M, Galli G, Petracca R, Falugi F, Grandi G, and Bolognesi M. Subunit association and conformational flexibility in the head subdomain of human CD81 large extracellular loop. Biol Chem 383: 1447–1452, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Knobeloch KP, Wright MD, Ochsenbein AF, Liesenfeld O, Lohler J, Zinkernagel RM, Horak I, and Orinska Z. Targeted inactivation of the tetraspanin CD37 impairs T-cell-dependent B-cell response under suboptimal costimulatory conditions. Mol Cell Biol 20: 5363–5369, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kolesnikova TV, Stipp CS, Rao RM, Lane WS, Luscinskas FW, and Hemler ME. EWI-2 modulates lymphocyte integrin {alpha}4ß1 functions. Blood 103: 3013–3019, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kong XT, Deng FM, Hu P, Liang FX, Zhou G, Auerbach AB, Genieser N, Nelson PK, Robbins ES, Shapiro E, Kachar B, and Sun TT. Roles of uroplakins in plaque formation, umbrella cell enlargement, and urinary tract diseases. J Cell Biol 167: 1195–1204, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kropshofer H, Spindeldreher S, Rohn TA, Platania N, Grygar C, Daniel N, Wolpl A, Langen H, Horejsi V, and Vogt AB. Tetraspan microdomains distinct from lipid rafts enrich select peptide-MHC class II complexes. Nat Immunol 3: 61–68, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  31. Le Naour F, Rubinstein E, Jasmin C, Prenant M, and Boucheix C. Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287: 319–321, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Levy S and Shoham T. The tetraspanin web modulates immune-signalling complexes. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 136–148, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  33. Liang FX, Riedel I, Deng FM, Zhou G, Xu C, Wu XR, Kong XP, Moll R, and Sun TT. Organization of uroplakin subunits: transmembrane topology, pair formation and plaque composition. Biochem J 355: 13–18, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Little KD, Hemler ME, and Stipp CS. Dynamic regulation of a GPCR-tetraspanin-G protein complex on intact cells: central role of CD81 in facilitating GPR56-G{alpha}q/11 association. Mol Biol Cell 15: 2375–2387, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Maecker HT and Levy S. Normal lymphocyte development but delayed humoral immune response in CD81-null mice. J Exp Med 185: 1505–1510, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Maecker HT, Todd SC, and Levy S. The tetraspanin superfamily: molecular facilitators. FASEB J 11: 428–442, 1997.[Abstract]
  37. Matsumoto AK, Martin DR, Carter RH, Klickstein LB, Ahearn JM, and Fearon DT. Functional dissection of the CD21/CD19/TAPA-1/Leu-13 complex of B lymphocytes. J Exp Med 178: 1407–1417, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Mittelbrunn M, Yanez-Mo M, Sancho D, Ursa A, and Sanchez-Madrid F. Cutting edge: dynamic redistribution of tetraspanin CD81 at the central zone of the immune synapse in both T lymphocytes and APC. J Immunol 169: 6691–6695, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Miyado K, Yamada G, Yamada S, Hasuwa H, Nakamura Y, Ryu F, Suzuki K, Kosai K, Inoue K, Ogura A, Okabe M, and Mekada E. Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science 287: 321–324, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Miyazaki T, Muller U, and Campbell KS. Normal development but differentially altered proliferative responses of lymphocytes in mice lacking CD81. EMBO J 16: 4217–4225, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  41. Moribe H, Yochem J, Yamada H, Tabuse Y, Fujimoto T, and Mekada E. Tetraspanin protein (TSP-15) is required for epidermal integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci 117: 5209–5220, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Nishiuchi R, Sanzen N, Nada S, Sumida Y, Wada Y, Okada M, Takagi J, Hasegawa H, and Sekiguchi K. Potentiation of the ligand-binding activity of integrin {alpha}3ß1 via association with tetraspanin CD151. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1939–1944, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Pileri P, Uematsu Y, Campagnoli S, Galli G, Falugi F, Petracca R, Weiner AJ, Houghton M, Rosa D, Grandi G, and Abrignani S. Binding of hepatitis C virus to CD81. Science 282: 938–941, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Rubinstein E, Le Naour F, Lagaudriere-Gesbert C, Billard M, Conjeaud H, and Boucheix C. CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD82 are components of a surface tetraspan network connected to HLA-DR and VLA integrins. Eur J Immunol 26: 2657–2665, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  45. Seigneuret M, Delaguillaumie A, Lagaudriere-Gesbert C, and Conjeaud H. Structure of the tetraspanin main extracellular domain. A partially conserved fold with a structurally variable domain insertion. J Biol Chem 276: 40055–40064, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Serru V, Le Naour F, Billard M, Azorsa DO, Lanza F, Boucheix C, and Rubinstein E. Selective tetraspan-integrin complexes (CD81/{alpha}4ß1, CD151/{alpha}3ß1, CD151/{alpha}6ß1) under conditions disrupting tetraspan interactions. Biochem J 340: 103–111, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Shoham T, Rajapaksa R, Boucheix C, Rubinstein E, Poe JC, Tedder TF, and Levy S. The tetraspanin CD81 regulates the expression of CD19 during B cell development in a postendoplasmic reticulum compartment. J Immunol 171: 4062–4072, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Silvie O, Rubinstein E, Franetich JF, Prenant M, Belnoue E, Renia L, Hannoun L, Eling W, Levy S, Boucheix C, and Mazier D. Hepatocyte CD81 is required for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium yoelii sporozoite infectivity. Nat Med 9: 93–96, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Stipp CS, Kolesnikova TV, and Hemler ME. EWI-2 is a major CD9 and CD81 partner and member of a novel Ig protein subfamily. J Biol Chem 276: 40545–40554, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Stipp CS, Kolesnikova TV, and Hemler ME. Functional domains in tetraspanin proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 28: 106–112, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  51. Szollosi J, Horejsi V, Bene L, Angelisova P, and Damjanovich S. Supramolecular complexes of MHC class I, MHC class II, CD20, and tetraspan molecules (CD53, CD81, and CD82) at the surface of a B cell line JY. J Immunol 157: 2939–2946, 1996.[Abstract]
  52. Takeda Y, Tachibana I, Miyado K, Kobayashi M, Miyazaki T, Funakoshi T, Kimura H, Yamane H, Saito Y, Goto H, Yoneda T, Yoshida M, Kumagai T, Osaki T, Hayashi S, Kawase I, and Mekada E. Tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 function to prevent the fusion of mononuclear phagocytes. J Cell Biol 161: 945–956, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Tarrant JM, Groom J, Metcalf D, Li R, Borobokas B, Wright MD, Tarlinton D, and Robb L. The absence of Tssc6, a member of the tetraspanin superfamily, does not affect lymphoid development but enhances in vitro T-cell proliferative responses. Mol Cell Biol 22: 5006–5018, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Todd SC, Lipps SG, Crisa L, Salomon DR, and Tsoukas CD. CD81 expressed on human thymocytes mediates integrin activation and interleukin 2-dependent proliferation. J Exp Med 184: 2055–2060, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Todres E, Nardi JB, and Robertson HM. The tetraspanin superfamily in insects. Insect Mol Biol 9: 581–590, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Tsitsikov EN, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, and Geha RS. Impaired CD19 expression and signaling, enhanced antibody response to type II T independent antigen and reduction of B-1 cells in CD81-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 10844–10849, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Tu L, Sun TT, and Kreibich G. Specific heterodimer formation is a prerequisite for uroplakins to exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 13: 4221–4230, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Waterhouse R, Ha C, and Dveksler GS. Murine CD9 is the receptor for pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 17. J Exp Med 195: 277–282, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Wright MD, Geary SM, Fitter S, Moseley GW, Lau LM, Sheng KC, Apostolopoulos V, Stanley EG, Jackson DE, and Ashman LK. Characterization of mice lacking the tetraspanin superfamily member CD151. Mol Cell Biol 24: 5978–5988, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Wright MD, Henkle KJ, and Mitchell GF. An immunogenic Mr 23,000 integral membrane protein of Schistosoma mansoni worms that closely resembles a human tumor-associated antigen. J Immunol 144: 3195–3200, 1990.[Abstract]
  61. Wu XR, Medina JJ, and Sun TT. Selective interactions of UPIa and UPIb, two members of the transmembrane 4 superfamily, with distinct single transmembrane-domained proteins in differentiated urothelial cells. J Biol Chem 270: 29752–29759, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Xu H, Lee SJ, Suzuki E, Dugan KD, Stoddard A, Li HS, Chodosh LA, and Montell C. A lysosomal tetraspanin associated with retinal degeneration identified via a genome-wide screen. EMBO J 23: 811–822, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  63. Yang X, Claas C, Kraeft SK, Chen LB, Wang Z, Kreidberg JA, and Hemler ME. Palmitoylation of tetraspanin proteins: modulation of CD151 lateral interactions, subcellular distribution, and integrin-dependent cell morphology. Mol Biol Cell 13: 767–781, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Yang X, Kovalenko OV, Tang W, Claas C, Stipp CS, and Hemler ME. Palmitoylation supports assembly and function of integrin-tetraspanin complexes. J Cell Biol 167: 1231–1240, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Yauch RL, Berditchevski F, Harler MB, Reichner J, and Hemler ME. Highly stoichiometric, stable, and specific association of integrin {alpha}3ß1 with CD151 provides a major link to phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, and may regulate cell migration. Mol Biol Cell 9: 2751–2765, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Yauch RL and Hemler ME. Specific interactions among transmembrane 4 superfamily (TM4SF) proteins and phosphoinositide 4-kinase. Biochem J 351: 629–637, 2000.[Medline]
  67. Yu J, Manabe M, Wu XR, Xu C, Surya B, and Sun TT. Uroplakin I: a 27-kD protein associated with the asymmetric unit membrane of mammalian urothelium. J Cell Biol 111: 1207–1216, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Zhang XA, Bontrager AL, and Hemler ME. Transmembrane-4 superfamily proteins associate with activated protein kinase C (PKC) and link PKC to specific ß1 integrins. J Biol Chem 276: 25005–25013, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Zhu GZ, Miller BJ, Boucheix C, Rubinstein E, Liu CC, Hynes RO, Myles DG, and Primakoff P. Residues SFQ (173–175) in the large extracellular loop of CD9 are required for gamete fusion. Development 129: 1995–2002, 2002.[Medline]
  70. Zitvogel L, Regnault A, Lozier A, Wolfers J, Flament C, Tenza D, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Raposo G, and Amigorena S. Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Nat Med 4: 594–600, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Mazurov, G. Heidecker, and D. Derse
The Inner Loop of Tetraspanins CD82 and CD81 Mediates Interactions with Human T Cell Lymphotrophic Virus Type 1 Gag Protein
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3896 - 3903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shoham, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shoham, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the Int. Union Physiol. Sci./Am. Physiol. Soc.